Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Politics
User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Sun Oct 01, 2017 1:48 pm

Kenyan Police lines and the job they do for their corrupt leaders.... :(

ImageImage
When you're done beating the shit out of your countrymen then you go back to your real dog's life....... :roll:
vooke wrote:
Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:37 pm
Re: Boinett dogs
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
vooke
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 10912
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:03 am
Location: Nairobbery

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by vooke » Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:26 pm

Wooi
Lakini si dogs live in kennels?
"No warrior entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier." (2 Timothy 2:4)..

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:36 pm

[soundcloud][/soundcloud]Kisii Burning.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:21 am


Mombasa is Officially Chupiless No Go Zone.... :lol:
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:26 am

Full Statement From Baba:


Image
NATIONAL SUPER ALLIANCE COALITION STATEMENT ON WITHDRAWAL OF THE CANDIDATURE OF RT.HON. RAILA ODINGA AND H.E STEPHEN KALONZO MUSYOKA IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SCHEDULED FOR 26TH OCTOBER, 2017.

1. On August 8 Kenyans voted in the 6th election since the return to multiparty politics in 1992—the political reform we call the Second Liberation. As is customary voting went smoothly. But when it came to tallying and transmission of results, everything that could go wrong did go wrong. It became the first presidential election in Africa to be annulled by the Court, and only the fourth in the world.

2. In the aftermath, the annulment has plunged the country into uncharted waters. That was to be expected. What we would not have expected is that the country’s leadership would be divided by a fundamental tenet of democracy, namely free and fair elections.

3. We at NASA have insisted that the fresh election ordered be held to the standard ordered by the Supreme Court, that is, in strict conformity with the Constitution and written law. We have provided a checklist of what we deem to be the “irreducible minimum” changes required to ensure compliance.

4. The validity of the checklist of the requirements for free and fair elections proposed by NASA has not been disputed by anyone, not by the IEBC, not by Jubilee or other actors and observers. The EU Observer Mission recommendations are in conformity with our ‘irreducible minimum.”

5. Instead, the case for proceeding with the fresh election on 26 October without these changes is being made on the grounds of time constraints. Jubilee and the other proponents of an election without reforms are saying “bora uchaguzi” (any election will do). But we in NASA are calling for “uchaguzi bora” (a credible election).

6. In a constitutional democracy, we should not be debating about a free and fair election, or compliance with court orders, or accountability for breach of public trust. We should have been working together to ensure that we uphold these values as they are not only our national values but are also the foundations of a credible electoral system.

7. Instead the IEBC has stonewalled meaningful deliberations on the necessary reforms to ensure that the elections of 26th October are free and fair. It has wasted valuable time engaging in public relations exercises intended to create the illusion of motion without any movement.

8. We have come to the conclusion that there is no intention on the part of the IEBC to undertake any changes to its operations and personnel to ensure that the “illegalities and irregularities” that led to the invalidation of the 8th August, 2008 do not happen again. All indications are that the election scheduled for 26 October will be worse than the previous one.

9. On its part, the Jubilee administration’s proposed amendment to the election laws demonstrates that it has no intention of competition on a level playing field. The only election Jubilee administration is interested in is one that it must win, even unlawfully.

10. Both Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto have gloated that they have the numbers in parliament to amend even the Constitution. The Jubilee Vice-Chairman is on record stating that Kenya requires a benevolent dictator and proceeded to exhort Uhuru Kenyatta to exercise dictatorial powers. These utterances provide the motive for the blatant across the board rigging of the August 8 elections— it was to secure the majorities that Jubilee needs to overrun our Constitution. Kenyatta and Ruto are beneficiaries, believers and defenders of the old order. They intend to overthrow our new constitutional order and re-install the old order. The over 300 elections petitions filed, majority against Jubilee are evidence that this claimed majority is fraudulent.

11. We wish to reiterate what we have stated in the past that we will not allow autocracy back into Kenya. It is unfortunate that international actors who have supported Kenyans in their quest for democracy and good governance are now on the side of appeasing dictatorship in the mistaken belief that it will maintain stability.

12. We shall not allow anything to dampen our morale. We won the battle for multiparty democracy. We won the battle for a new Constitution. We are going to win the battle for a free and fair election.

13. After deliberating on our position in respect of the upcoming election, considering the interests of the people of Kenya, the region and the world at large, we believe that all will be best served by NASA vacating its presidential candidature in the election scheduled for 26 October 2017.

14. We have based our decision on the foregoing, and the following constitutional and legal basis.

15. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN THE ELECTION PETITION No. 1 of 2017 RAILA ODINGA vs IEBC and others

16. In arriving at its decision to nullify the presidential election held on August 8 2017, the Supreme Court made the following findings of illegalities and irregularities based on which the National Super Alliance (NASA) Coalition proposed a 12 point irreducible minimum required to make the fresh election fully compliant with the Supreme Court decision;

17. Statutory Forms
18. On the matter of statutory forms used in the elections, the court found that contrary to the assertion by the Commission that it had fully complied with the Constitution and the law; and, the position taken by the Commission (through the Affidavit of Immaculate Kassait) that the Commission had developed standards for its electoral goods prior to their procurement including specific security features for each ballot paper and statutory form in order to prevent duplication, misuse, piracy, fraud, counterfeiting and to improve controls, and that the statutory forms and ballot papers had the features which included: guilloche patterns, anti-copy patterns, watermarks, micro text, tapered serialization, invisible UV Printing, polling station data personalization, self-carbonating element and barcodes, different colour for each ballot paper and that the forms were in a standard form or format, the scrutiny supervised by the Registrar of the Supreme Court and authenticated by the agents of all the parties to the case to the case had revealed that: –
a) The Commission declared Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta the President elect before it received results from 11,883 polling stations and 17 Constituencies;
b) Form 34C used to declare Uhuru Kenyatta President elect, was not original but a photocopy; and, that no explanation was given as to the whereabouts of the original form. And, that the form, as crucial as it is, bore neither a watermark nor serial number;
c) Forms 34B used to declare Uhuru Kenyatta president elect were of dubious authenticity; and, that some of the forms were photocopies, carbon copies or were not signed by the Returning Officers. Out of 291 Forms 34B, 56 did not have watermark feature, 31 did not bear serial numbers, 5 were not signed at all, were not in a standard form or format, among other discrepancies;
d) Out of a random sample of 4,299 Forms 34As examined, a total of 189 forms had not been filled in the “hand-over” section, 287 forms had not been filled in the “take-over” section, 481 forms were carbon copies, 11 forms had no water mark; and, that considering the sample size, it is apparent that the discrepancies were widespread.
e) The forms were not in a standard form or format. The Supreme Court ended its examination of this part of the judgment by raising the following question: “Who introduced these forms into the system?”

19. Application of Technology
20. On the matter of application of technology, the Supreme Court found and held that:
a) The Commission failed to electronically transmit the statutory Forms 34As and 34Bs as required by section 39(1C) of the Elections Act;
b) The Court accepted the Petitioner’s claims that the Commission’s IT system was infiltrated and compromised and the data therein interfered with or IEBC officials themselves interfered with the data or simply refused to accept that it had bungled the whole transmission system and were unable to verify the data; this being the only logical reason the interlocutory orders for audit and access thereto were frustrated by the Commission;
c) While among the 11,000 polling stations the Commission claimed were off the 3G and 4G ranges were in: Bomet, Bungoma, Busia, Homa Bay, Kajiado, Kericho, Kiambu, Kisumu, Kisii, Kirinyaga, Nyeri, Siaya and Vihiga Counties, most parts of these counties have fairly good road network and infrastructure that it would take a short time for the Presiding Officers to travel to vantage points from where they would electronically transmit the results.
d) The Commission had known the areas where network is weak or totally lacking beforehand and should have made provision for alternative transmission. In one of its press briefings before the elections, the Commission had assured the country that it had carefully considered every conceivable eventuality regarding the issue of electronic transmission of the presidential election results and categorically stated that technology was not going to fail. The Commission had engaged three internet service providers to deal with any network challenges.
e) The Commission had contumaciously disobeyed the order of scrutiny which was a golden opportunity for the Commission to place before court evidence to debunk the Petitioner’s claims of hacking; by denying access to two critical areas of their servers; its logs which would have proved or disproved the Petitioner’s claim of hacking into the system and altering the presidential election results and its servers with Forms 34As and 34B electronically transmitted from polling stations and Constituency Tallying Centres.
f) If the Commission had nothing to hide, even before the order was made, it would have itself readily provided access to its ICT logs and servers to disprove the petitioner’s claims.
21. These blatant illegalities and irregularities were not without motive. It is inconceivable that election body would falsify 80 out of 290 constituency tallies (27.5%) for the sake of it. The meaning of the Supreme Court decision is that the so called numbers claimed by Uhuru Kenyatta are fraudulent. The election was not shambolic. It was rigged for Uhuru Kenyatta. Uhuru Kenyatta lost the election. It stand to reason that we won it.
22. The IEBC has refused, neglected or failed to put in place mechanisms to correct these illegalities and irregularities. We deem that the fresh election ordered by the Supreme Court cannot therefore be held. Allowing the candidature of Raila Amolo Odinga and Stephen Kalonzo Musyoka to lend credence to the election now scheduled is to participate in an illegality.

23. II. BAD FAITH
(A) The IEBC
(i) For over five weeks, the commission has engaged us in a ping pong game well knowing they had no intention to streamline the electoral system to accord with the constitution and electoral laws.
(ii) It is now clear that the same criminal enterprise that perpetuated the fraud in the August election is firmly in charge of the Commission and setting up even more lethal mechanisms to defraud the Kenyan voter.
(iii) The conservative wing of the IEBC have now firmly crystalized their stranglehold of the operations of the Commission with every decision of the chairman being countermanded and with the proposed amendments to the electoral laws to dilute the powers, authority and standing of the chairperson of the Commission as the Returning officer of the Presidential elections.
(iv) This is coupled with the retention of the same service providers that were complicit in the worst electoral fraud ever witnessed in modern times including Safran/OT Morpho, Al Ghurair etc.
(v) The Commission CEO who was the coup plotter in chief and his litany of senior secretariat staff continue to dominate the operations of the commission and stifle any attempt to initiate reforms at the commission.
(vi) It is now evident that jubilee is firmly in charge of IEBC through four commissioners who have set out to implement the jubilee agenda within the commission.

(B) Jubilee Administration
(i) The ill-conceived amendments to election laws are not only unconstitutional but go against international best practice that in the middle of an elections contest one cannot change the rules and put in place rules that seek to favour him. Moreover, these profound changes to the electoral architecture are being pushed through without the broad based consultations as required by the Constitution.
(ii) Furthermore, it is clear that the amendments are intended to legalize and regularize the illegalities that led to the invalidation of the August 8 election. It stands to reason that the motive for these amendments is to use the same tactics to rig the scheduled election.
(iii) The State has in the period intervening the nullification of 8 August presidential election, gazettement of fresh and pending the 26 October fresh elections, withdrawn security to the NASA Presidential and deputy Presidential candidate. This has made it untenable for the candidates to campaign freely without fear of being harmed. The State has done this well aware that under Article 138 (8) (b) a presidential election would be cancelled if a presidential candidate or his deputy dies.

VACATING THE ELECTION THE ONLY ROUTE TO A FREE FAIR AND CREDIBLE ELECTION WAY

24. The IEBC published the gazette notice declaring the fresh dates for the Presidential elections with Rt. Hon. Raila Amolo Odinga and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta based on the Supreme Court decision of 2013 on a question brought for direction by Attorney General who is the Chief Government legal advisor. In paragraph 289 and 290, the Supreme Court found as follows:

25. 289… It is clear that a fresh election under Article 140(3) is triggered by the invalidation of the election of the declared President-elect, by the Supreme Court, following a successful petition against such election. Since such a fresh election is built on the foundations of the invalidated election, it can, in our opinion, only involve candidates who participated in the original election. In that case, there will be no basis for a fresh nomination of candidates for the resultant electoral contest.

26. 290. Suppose, however, that the candidates, or a candidate who took part in the original election, dies or abandons the electoral quest before the scheduled date: then the provisions of Article 138(1) (b) would become applicable, with fresh nominations ensuing.”

27. As per a correction issued on 6 May 2013, the Supreme clarified that the relevant article is above is 138 (8) (b) which deals with cancellation of a presidential election in the event of the death of the president or the deputy on or before scheduled date. The Supreme Court finding expanded this clause to include when a candidate withdraws from the presidential election.

28. The implication of this provision is that upon our withdrawal, the election scheduled for the 26 October stands cancelled.

29. Our withdrawal from the election requires the IEBC to cancel the election and to conduct fresh nominations. The procedure for nomination of presidential candidates is provided for in the Elections Act 2011, Section 13 (1) which states:

30. “A political party shall nominate its candidates for an election under this act at least ninety days before a general election under this Act in accordance with its constitution rules.”

31. It is clear that this provision gives adequate time to undertake the reforms necessary to conduct an election that is in strict conformity with the Constitution, the relevant laws and the Constitution.

32. This being the case, it is our conviction that our withdrawal is in the best interest of the country and a win-win for everyone.


____________________________________ ___________________________________
RT. HON RAILA AMOLO ODINGA

H.E STEPHEN KALONZO MUSYOKA

____________________________________ __________________________________
HON. WYCLIFFE MUSALIA MUDAVADI

HON. MOSES MASIKA WETANGULA

Dated at Nairobi this 10th day of October 2017
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:20 pm

The Supreme Court ruling paragraph 290 reads;

"Suppose, however, that the candidates, or a candidate who took part in the original election, dies or abandons the electoral quest before the scheduled date:
then the provisions of Article 138(1)b would become applicable, with fresh nominations ensuing,” paragraph 290 of the ruling reads.

Article 138(2) of the constitution reads;
If two or more candidates for President are nominated, an election shall be held in each constituency.
Which means if Raila quits on 26th October, a few days to the Election date, there will be No Election but organization of fresh polls marked by fresh nominations of presidential candidates by political parties as outlined in the Constitution on Procedure of conducting Presidential Election.

The other option is article 138(2) of the Constitution where if Elections are not held in any constituency or polling
station, Its rendered Null & void & illegal.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Tue Oct 10, 2017 1:09 pm

Ugly Itumbi, The Director of State House Operative Small Minds Stunned by Legalities.... :P


Image

Logan wrote:
Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:20 pm
The Supreme Court ruling paragraph 290 reads;

"Suppose, however, that the candidates, or a candidate who took part in the original election, dies or abandons the electoral quest before the scheduled date:
then the provisions of Article 138(1)b would become applicable, with fresh nominations ensuing,” paragraph 290 of the ruling reads.

Article 138(2) of the constitution reads;
If two or more candidates for President are nominated, an election shall be held in each constituency.
Which means if Raila quits on 26th October, a few days to the Election date, there will be No Election but organization of fresh polls marked by fresh nominations of presidential candidates by political parties as outlined in the Constitution on Procedure of conducting Presidential Election.

The other option is article 138(2) of the Constitution where if Elections are not held in any constituency or polling
station, Its rendered Null & void & illegal.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:51 pm

Image
Uhuruto: "If Raila doesn't want elections he should withdraw, we don't care"

Image
Uhuruto: "Why is Raila withdrawing? He is a coward."
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:31 pm

ImageImage
Party Leader PM Raila Odinga has left the country for a two-day visit to the United Kingdom
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:17 am

Point Of View... :P

"We should actually sympathize with Jubilee. They don't have a plan.
You see when one is planning to steal, the only plan one creates is how to get away with it.
No one makes a plan that stipulates how to act when you are caught.
Same here. In Jubilee's case, they had one plan. A clear plan;

1. Rig Elections and Declare Uhuru President.

2. Swear in Uhuru and Seize Control of the Instruments of Power

3. Negotiate with the "NASA Losers" in the aftermath when you have power and the guns.

Image
The problem is Jubilee got caught. Now, no thief ever creates a plan to deal with "getting caught".

The madness we are being treated to by Jubilee is testimony that UhuRuto teams are operating in a "Strategic Vacuum".
They have to create a "quick plan" in realtime after being caught in the act. The "plans" have to be created and implemented in a changed environment - where the perception of an all-powerful Prince and Presidency is gone up in smoke. And time is not on their side.

That's the reason for the desperation, the confusion, and the blunders."


From The Politician by David Ndii.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:04 pm

Breaking......

Baba has said, and confirmed....There will be no elections on 26th October... :P

A fresh election was triggered upon the IEBC’s receipt of Raila’s withdrawal. Form 24A under Regulation 52 (1) was unnecessary, as the election was not preceded by nominations.

Image
Familiar to all lawyers is Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s statement, “If my countrymen want to go to hell, I will help them. It's my job.”

Have our judges taken us there?

Raila pulled out of October 26 polls citing the IEBC’s failure to reform. Uhuru dared him, stating that Kenya is bigger than an individual.

The withdrawal was met with lamentations; Raila was accused of insensitivity to the nation’s polls preparation resources. The ensuing stalemate is compounded by partisan interpretations on the ramifications of the decision.

Justice Mativo’s inclusion of Ekuro Aukot only adds to the confusion. In Parliament, MP Mbarire celebrated, “We can now have an election now that Ekuro will be on the ballot”.

Really?

Uhuru and Raila were gazetted as the only candidates for the rerun. The 2013 Supreme Court decision limiting candidates in a fresh election following nullification to the president-elect and runners-up, informed the IEBC’s decision. Raila’s withdrawal was based on the court’s decision that nominations and an election be held under Article 138 of the Constitution if one of the two candidates withdraws.

https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2017/10 ... o_c1651072
Logan wrote:
Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:17 am
Point Of View... :P

"We should actually sympathize with Jubilee. They don't have a plan.
You see when one is planning to steal, the only plan one creates is how to get away with it.
No one makes a plan that stipulates how to act when you are caught.
Same here. In Jubilee's case, they had one plan. A clear plan;

1. Rig Elections and Declare Uhuru President.

2. Swear in Uhuru and Seize Control of the Instruments of Power

3. Negotiate with the "NASA Losers" in the aftermath when you have power and the guns.

Image
The problem is Jubilee got caught. Now, no thief ever creates a plan to deal with "getting caught".

The madness we are being treated to by Jubilee is testimony that UhuRuto teams are operating in a "Strategic Vacuum".
They have to create a "quick plan" in realtime after being caught in the act. The "plans" have to be created and implemented in a changed environment - where the perception of an all-powerful Prince and Presidency is gone up in smoke. And time is not on their side.

That's the reason for the desperation, the confusion, and the blunders."


From The Politician by David Ndii.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Fri Oct 13, 2017 4:29 pm

Image
Now Kenya Police are also armed with pangas? :roll:
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:57 am

I saw those anti-Raila protesters in London and couldn’t help but think. You’re forced to live outside your country huddled in oversize winter coats and ill-fitting shoes doing menial work or driving a taxi in the name of eking out a living... :oops:

Your weekly excitos are meeting in those awful East London pubs to drink, fight and argue with other homesick Kenyans. While you struggle to stay warm in Milton Keynes some other illiterate self-entitled chaps with fake university degrees loot your country dry.

You can barely send enough money home for your parents' healthcare but still, believe in Jubilee Tano Tena. Kila siku checking blogs to see what’s happening in Kenya…..(this, of course, is a generalization…)…

Image
Now Kenya Police are also armed with pangas? :roll:



Joe Mwangi says

October 14, 2017 at 11:14 am

That is lack of education, am really embarrassed. If Kenya is good for all, what are they doing in the UK? Why shouldn’t they be in here and help develop the country? His father, only made us know that way of leaving is through stealing and prostitution in the name of wiira ni wiira. Instead of education.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Sat Oct 14, 2017 5:13 pm

Image
The Chronology Of Events Leading To Protests Against Raila In London: Why is this :?: :oops:

1. Upon the confirmation of Raila's intended visit to London on Sunday for Chatham lecture, Pauline Njoroge and Amina Mohammed were called to the statehouse.

2. Under the guidance of Erick Ng'eno, a senior member of the presidential strategic communication unit domicile at the statehouse, they were under firm instruction to stage a smear campaign against Raila in an overseas land.

3. On Monday, while Mr Odinga was hosting a delegation of Maasai at Okoa Kenya offices in Lavington, powerful jubilee women were meeting in a house at Muthangari Road, Lavington.

4. The sole but paramount agenda was to plan how to disrupt Raila's lecture through heckling and carrying jubilee placards encrypted with writings meant to demean Raila while in London.

Image
5. The immigration department was tasked with the duty of mobilizing kikuyu jubilee supporters in London, making of the placards plus other merchandise to be used during the event and by Wednesday everything was supplied.

6. Cambridge Analytica operatives churning propaganda and the firm running PR in Uhuru's presidential secretariat then laid down the strategy of expediting and peddling around the narrative behind such archaic act.

7. Through their ringleader, an entrepreneur by the name Jane Wanjiru Kihara who held a Skype conversation with Erick Ngeno yesterday at 10.36 pm, the group was informed how to carry out their mandate.
Today, they just did exactly how they were instructed to!

A civilian not vying for presidency followed to a foreign land by a lame duck president, now you know who is running the nation.

OCTOBER 14, 2017
NASA PRESS STATEMENT BY SEN. JAMES ORENGO.

BOINET AND MATIANGI COMMITTING GENOCIDE:

We are here to give you an update on yesterday's demonstrations in support of the NASA Coalition's demands for reforms in the Electoral and Boundaries Commission, IEBC.

Image
We are happy to report that Kenyans have responded with enthusiasm to our calls for reforms and internalized the idea that we cannot go to another election with the current IEBC and support institutions.Yesterday, tens of thousands of Kenyans took to the streets in most of the major towns in Kenya, including Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, Nakuru, Kakamega, Kisii, Voi, Kitui, Busia, Garissa, Wajir, Mandera, among others.
There were demonstrations in at least 20 counties. Most of the demonstrations, with the exception of Nairobi, Mombasa, and Kisumu, began on a very peaceful note. However, in five towns, namely Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, Bondo, Migori and Homa Bay, police broke the demos forcefully, resulting in several injuries, destruction of property and, most unfortunately, the deaths of three innocent protesters.

Image
The three killings were in Bondo Town where police shot dead the three unarmed men at close range completely without justification. Until now, the police are still struggling to find a rationale for the killings. One senior officer said the three were shot while trying to invade a police station. Another has said they were looting a shop. Yet another said they attacked a police officer in the course of the protests.
Our supporters from the ground have said none of these theories being advanced by the police is true. We have commenced our own investigations and welcome all agencies to help understand what happened in Bondo yesterday.
Specifically, we are appealing to the Independent Police Oversight Authority and credible human rights organizations such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Kenya Human Rights Commission, IMLU and indeed any other with the investigative capacity to move to Bondo quickly and get the facts on how these innocent Kenyans were killed.
In Kisumu, more than two dozen people were hospitalized with conditions ranging from serious gunshot wounds to extreme teargas intoxication.
Among the hospitalized were over 20 pupils of the Mount Carmel Academy in Nyalenda, whose school was invaded by policemen who threw teargas canisters at the pupils in the middle of a lesson. The school was not a scene of the protests, but the police still went ahead to attack it and endanger the lives of pupils. This is the second time police have attacked kindergarten pupils in Kisumu.
In Homa Bay and Migori towns, the police opened fire on demonstrators, wounding several. A number of survivors are currently in hospital. As you have all seen in the media, among the wounded was a 73 year-old woman who was shot while walking from a hospital where she had been receiving treatment.
The above highlights from Bondo, Kisumu, Migori and Homa Bay capture a worrying trend of the police using disproportionate force on demonstrators particularly in Luo Nyanza. By sheer numbers alone it is clear that the police are using a different standard in responding to demonstrators in Nyanza and other areas.
In addition to killings and maiming, the police are also engaged in a systematic plot of looting and destruction of property. Our supporters have reported that in Kisumu over the past two weeks, there are usually flanks of civilians who operate behind the police, whose sole work is to destroy or loot shops.
We are yet to establish this claim, but those of you who have been following the news know that among the suspects arrested for the looting of Tumaini Supermarket two weeks ago were several people who are not known residents of Kisumu. Could these be policemen operating under cover? Are they pro-state mercenaries? These questions have gained urgency in light of the photo, taken by a journalist, showing one policeman in the demos yesterday armed with a panga in addition to his regular firearm. Now, the police are not know to arm with pangas.
We have also learnt of growing police intimidation against our organizers and even the media. In Kisumu yesterday, the police tried to block media access to their operation zone. We have been informed that a senior GSU officer from the County Commander's office threatened a Star newspaper journalist who was following the protests along with other reporters.
In Vihiga County, officers commanding two police stations have given direct warnings to three NASA activists that they would face unspecified consequences for leading demonstrations. Similar warnings have been given to our organisers in Machakos, Eldoret, Maralal, Isiolo and Narok.
Our observation of the situation is that the illegal ban announced by Matiangi last week is already being piloted throughout the country. The State appears to have unveiled a policy of profiling supporters of NASA and other protesters. This policy is being executed by Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiangi and Inspector General of Police Mr. Joseph Boinet.
Boinet, in his role as Inspector General of National Police Service, and Matiangi, as CS for Interior have authorised the use of excessive and lethal force in attacks against NASA supporters. They have also authorized the use of militia and killer gangs to harm and kill NASA supporters. We have seen police officers armed with daggers and guns. We have seen militia roaming the streets and descending on supporters in police uniforms while carrying teargas canisters.
We have reasonable grounds to believe that these two State officers Matiangi and Boinet are criminally responsible for crimes against humanity that are being meted out on NASA supporters in the name of preserving public order.
We hold the two responsible for the hiring of militia and dressing them in police fatigues and arming them with tear gas and guns. These gangs, together with police, are carrying out a widespread and systematic attack against members of the population perceived as supporting NASA and its leaders.
The target is primarily Luo, Luhya, Somali, Kamba, Abagusi, Maasai and coastal communities. These police officers and support militia have express authority to murder, rape and commit other forms of inhumane acts with State protection and pay. They are also allowed to loot and destroy properties while Matiangi and Boinet ensure that police do not intervene to stop the attacks or to punish those who carry them out.
In Luo Nyanza in particular, there is a clear policy of ethnic targeting being implemented with brute force. There is a determination to turn Luo land into the Biafra or Kosovo of Kenya. The sole purpose of these actions is to help Uhuru Kenyatta and Jubilee keep power at all costs. We warn that this country will pay heavily for these policies if they are not stopped now.
Our protests continue from Monday and will go on every day. If the brutality against our people continues, we will not sit back and see our people being butchered. We will take actions that will ensure the self-defense of our people against a marauding State. And we warn Uhuru Kenyatta to be aware that he is steadily driving the country towards the end of Kenya as we know it. He and his officers must be prepared to shoulder the consequences.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

User avatar
Logan
Level: Council of the gods
Posts: 8605
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: Why Chupiless Thieves Must Go Home...

Unread post by Logan » Sun Oct 15, 2017 7:37 am

Ndii was right to bring up the lack of plan by disorganized chupiless thieves.... :oops:


Image
Logan wrote:
Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:17 am
Point Of View... :P

"We should actually sympathize with Jubilee. They don't have a plan.
You see when one is planning to steal, the only plan one creates is how to get away with it.
No one makes a plan that stipulates how to act when you are caught.
Same here. In Jubilee's case, they had one plan. A clear plan;

1. Rig Elections and Declare Uhuru President.

2. Swear in Uhuru and Seize Control of the Instruments of Power

3. Negotiate with the "NASA Losers" in the aftermath when you have power and the guns.

Image
The problem is Jubilee got caught. Now, no thief ever creates a plan to deal with "getting caught".

The madness we are being treated to by Jubilee is testimony that UhuRuto teams are operating in a "Strategic Vacuum".
They have to create a "quick plan" in realtime after being caught in the act. The "plans" have to be created and implemented in a changed environment - where the perception of an all-powerful Prince and Presidency is gone up in smoke. And time is not on their side.

That's the reason for the desperation, the confusion, and the blunders."


From The Politician by David Ndii.
The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga :D

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Panzer. and 19 guests